Hello,
First sorry for my poor english, i need to improve it, jejeje...
I want to share with you some reflexions about the genetic in this specie...
Actually, there are two morphs, "natural morphs", blotched and striped... at the begining, all of the available animals were blotched, and later the striped ones appear out of australia... one of the most famous breeders in USA said me that the striped morph is a recessive trait... but two years working with them show me that itīs not the reality...
The last year, with the same striped male and with 5 differents blotched females (2 of a friend and 2 mines) we obtain near to 25 striped babies... some example pics there:
This year i bought another striped male (it was impossible for me to find an adult blotched one)... at the moment, only four animals have born, two different cluthes from two different blotched females (which give me the last season only striped babys)... here the results:
May 26th, female 1
June 7th, female 2
So, i think itīs obviously to say that
blotched is a simple recesive trait in D. pulcher... and striped morph is a dominant trait... i suposse that all of you are ok with this... following this thinking, i donīt know the parentals of my "second male", but obviosly itīs a D. pulcher striped het. blotched...
After this, i have a question... if iīm in the correct thinking, blotched and striped ones live in the same territory (theyīre not a locality), and itīs far easy to find blotched animals than striped ones... how is possible that is more common a recessive than a normal trait? if they share the territory... we still have to much to learn...
Best regards! José R.
__________________
http://www.hemisferioreptiles.com
AFRICA: Hemitheconyx caudicinctus, Pachydactylus rangei, Ebenavia inunguis, Paroedura androyensis.
OCEANIA: Nephrurus (levis, deleani, wheeleri, amyae) Strophurus (williamsi, taenicauda), Diplodactylus (g.rex, pulcher), Lucasium (steindachneri, byrnei), Heteronotia binoei, Rhacodactylus leachianus.