CRICKETS SUCK! - Here's the alternative (Blatta lateralis)
Welcome to the Geckos Unlimited forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
NOTE that if you have an AOL account, you will not receive the activation email. AOL automatically deletes these without you even knowing. We encourage you to use other email providers.
CRICKETS SUCK! - Here's the alternative (Blatta lateralis)
Rusty Reds
Introducing Rusty Reds, the most revolutionary live prey to ever hit the reptile market.
With a 99% survival rate and offering unparalleled nutrition, Rusty Reds are fast becoming the new mainstay staple in reptile feeding.
Advantages include:
* Better survival rate than crickets (99% survival guaranteed)
* Longer digestive tract for better gut-loading
* Straight-line movement making an easier target for reptiles to catch
* NO JUMPING
* NO CHIRPING
* No glass climbing
* No flying
* Much less odor than crickets
* Longer life span than crickets providing fewer unused die-offs
* More cost-effective than all other currently available traditional prey items
Prices are:
1000-3000.…………………..$17.50 per thousand
4000-9000.…………………..$16.00 per thousand
10000-15000.………………..$14.50 per thousand
Online ordering is fast and easy. Click on the link below to access our website for a price list and order page. Or you can e-mail us directly for ordering information.
Be the first in your reptile club to use what will soon become the first name in reptile feeding.
Try Rusty Reds today!
According to their website, yah. I was wndering how long it would be before these guys went way down in price. I think they would have better luck just referring to them by scientific name, though.