
08-15-2011, 10:40 PM
|
 |
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In the sticks near Woodland, CA
Posts: 166
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daggekko
I assume that you have hatchlings that appear as if they could be female due to the sacs end up male? One of my first 2 P laticauda hatchlings definately had those sacs and did turn out female. At the same rate, I think the other is female as well but never really had the sacs as much.
Why do you think full-spectrum lighting decreases them? That seems kindof backwards to me.
|
A good non-domestic vet, Dr. Ken Harkewicz, in Berkeley, CA and I had been talking about this. He suggested that certain geckos can only process so much Calcium with oral D3, that these types were more dependent on the sun for the metabolic reaction with D3. Having over 100 Phelsuma of 30+ species I have observed some species do tend to get the sacs more prominently that others on the same supplements. Since I have put them under full spectrum lighting it seems to have decreased their sacs.
Folks familiar with Phelsuma in the wild tell me they do not have these big sacs. In captivity I have noticed it in both sexes, females just tend to get bigger sacs. They have taken in calcium, they just can't do anything with it and it stays in those sacs. I have x-rays of a P. standingi with four broken legs and huge calcium sacs! So, what I took from this as a breeder was calcium sacs do not represent calcium metabolism. That is a separate matter, in fact the presence of large sacs may indicate there is an issue with processing calcium for the rest of the body and for things like eggs. IMHO.
__________________
"You can never have too many P. klemmeri!"
|