
12-13-2009, 11:13 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Barre, VT
Posts: 643
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
|
|
I eceive update from the USARK and the bill S373 has been just limited to the 9 giants. So balls and other small pythons are off the list. Except for dwarf retics, and anacondas. Still banning them isnt going to do anything for the feral pop. It's sooo true that the HSUS is totally against any reptile ownership. They have been lobbying against it for the last 10 years. Now they have almost succeded in taking out a peice of the reptiles they are so against. And if they can take those out without any scientific proof they will keep trying whether they do it all at once or peice by peice is the question. I agree that anyone with a reptile should definately come together and oppose this bill if not just for the simple fact we all love reptiles. The reasons for this bill are really just a sham for the truth. They just arent fond of this hobby. Banning will do nothing for conservationas the feral pop will just keep growing as long as they have food, warmth, and a breeding partner. And there has only been 4 snake related deaths since 2006 in the us. So there arent many killer snakes out there. Unfortunately we have multitudes of morons and uneducated people surrounding us. So that is never helpful. Even though my ball pythons are off the list I am still fighting for those that have there incomes, and animals on the line.
__________________
Check out what's new on my website www.Homegrownscales.com
|