Geckos Unlimited







FORUM MENU: Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  Geckos Unlimited > Gecko Spotlight > Leaf-tailed Geckos | Uroplatus

Welcome to the Geckos Unlimited forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

NOTE that if you have an AOL account, you will not receive the activation email. AOL automatically deletes these without you even knowing. We encourage you to use other email providers.
Like Tree5Likes
  • 4 Post By Calfirecap
  • 1 Post By Calfirecap

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-18-2012, 11:08 AM
Calfirecap's Avatar
Newbie
   
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mtns.,California
Posts: 196
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Default Updated Growth Rate Chart

I finely got around to crunching the numbers and updating my U. phantasticus growth rate chart. It represents 3 years of data from weekly weighing of phants from hatching to 24 weeks. It does not contain the data from any 'failure to thrive' geckos or those that either died or went missing prior to 12 weeks. The sample size was 110 most of which went the full 24 weeks so I'm pretty confident the information is accurate. With the larger sample size there aren't as many spikes in the graph as before which seems to make sence. I'm no longer taking weekly weights as it got pretty time consuming and I think I have enough information now.
There isn't any Earth shattering value in this project, but I figured I might as well share it anyway. Take a look and see.

Lawrence
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Phant growth 2008-10.jpg (16.5 KB, 60 views)
__________________
U. phantasticus
U. sikorae
U. pietchmanni
R. ciliatus
www.gekkotas.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2  
Old 01-18-2012, 12:21 PM
lauraleellbp's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Naples, Florida, USA
Posts: 712
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Female
Default

So if I'm reading that correctly (I can't seem to get it to expand very large?), the different colored lines represent groups of geckos with the same hatch weights?

If that's the case, I'm finding it extremely interesting how the heavier/larger hatchlings definitely kept that "advantage" over time- that's true for every single weight group!

Have all your eggs been incubated at the same temperatures (as in- do you use a fridge/incubator that means all of them were kept at the same, constant temp year round?), or how do you incubate?

Last edited by lauraleellbp; 01-18-2012 at 02:42 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-18-2012, 01:28 PM
Salzy's Avatar
Junior member
   
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stevens Point, WI
Posts: 272
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Male
Default

It might not be "earth shattering" Lawrence, but it's great information regardless. Nobody else has been doing this as far as I know, and I'm happy that you took the time to do it and put it together for us.
__________________
Kyle J. Salzmann

Rhacodactylus: R. auriculatus, R. chahoua, R. ciliatus, R. sarasinorum, R. leachianus henkeli (cross)
Uroplatus: U. phantasticus, U. sikorae (samieti and sikorae)
Homopholis wahlbergi, Eurydactylodes vieillardi, Phelsuma laticauda Lepidodactylus lugubris


www.gekkonidazed.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-18-2012, 03:45 PM
Calfirecap's Avatar
Newbie
   
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mtns.,California
Posts: 196
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Default

Laurelee,
You are reading it correctly and you are right it doesn't expand very well.
The blue line represents 0.3 gram hatchlings.
The red line represents 0.4 grams hatchlings.
The Yellow line represents 0.5 gram hatchlings.
The Green represents 0.6 gram hatchlings.

As for incubation, I've used a lot of different methods with day time temps ranging from 67.3 up to 70f. I'm currently using a day time temp of 69.8 with a PM temp drop of 2 degrees, but I'm thinking of dropping the day time temp back down a degree.

Salzy,
Thanks and you are welcome, that's what it is all about.

Lawrence
__________________
U. phantasticus
U. sikorae
U. pietchmanni
R. ciliatus
www.gekkotas.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-18-2012, 03:49 PM
lauraleellbp's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Naples, Florida, USA
Posts: 712
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Female
Default

Have you noticed any difference in ths sizes of your hatchlings in relation to incubation temp?

I'm asking b/c of all the recent experiences Crestie breeders have been documenting of producing much larger, better developed hatchlings when incubating at lower temps. I'm wondering if this could be true for Uroplatus, too?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2012, 07:15 PM
Junior member
   
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: France
Posts: 263
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Male
Default

that's not new among rhacodactylus, and that's also true for uroplatus, as well as many others species
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2012, 07:19 PM
Jackp308's Avatar
Newbie
   
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 96
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Default

Neat chart. Nice dedication thanks for taking the time to share your info.


Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
that's not new among rhacodactylus, and that's also true for uroplatus, as well as many others species
Ive been told by a successful breeder of Uroplatus sikorae for 10 yrs that lower incubation temps usually produced weaker hatchings with that species.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2012, 07:53 PM
Junior member
   
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: France
Posts: 263
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Male
Default

it sounds weird to me but I never worked with sikorae though

temps are certainly not the only factor to consider
(otherwise it should have been made with breeders of the same age and weight, with same care, same amount of food, same food quality throughout the experience etc)

then what means lower temps, when you touch one's extremum, it is normal to have bad results

in fact I should have talked about temp range instead of low temps
like many others did observe before myself, hatchlings are usually more robusts, and female ratio is better in many species, when the eggs are incubated in the lower (not the lowest) range with day/night temp difference
(there's no scientific statement here just something heard and observed among many gecko species)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-21-2012, 01:38 AM
Calfirecap's Avatar
Newbie
   
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mtns.,California
Posts: 196
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Default

Laurelee,
I can't say if the lower temps result in more robust hatchlings or not, but I do seem to see a slightly higher female to male ratio with the lower temps. The thing is I can't be absolutely certain as there is a seasonal variation with the temps. My incubator doesn't have a cooling element so there are times in the summer when I don't have good control of the temperatures. In other words, I don't have any solid data to substantiate a valid conclusion.
lauraleellbp likes this.
__________________
U. phantasticus
U. sikorae
U. pietchmanni
R. ciliatus
www.gekkotas.com
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

vBClassified Featured Listings
2011 Well Established Unsexed Crested Geckos


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

© Geckos Unlimited 2007Ad Management by RedTyger

Vivarium Top Sites Fauna Top Sites Exotic Pet Sites Gecko Topsites