How do you guys do it?

docszoo

New member
My camera is not very smart. It only focuses on things I dont exactly want it to focus on :x Anyway, horrible, but I promised pic of croc skulls.

p20700962oi.jpg


p20701086zt.jpg

Here is just the croc, looks cool dont he?
p20700950ml.jpg


Also, Leona is very annoying. First of all, I open here cage and find here tail skinny! :evil: She also would not stop moving.
 

docszoo

New member
Everyone asks me that. Unfortunatly, no. I have to go to Morocco :roll: They are very rare. I did find this one though :D

p20701108vu.jpg

My mom was holding a ruler (12 inches) right there. 20 in. fish. Found it at Wyoming :D
 

docszoo

New member
:lol: no, if I was to get a croc skull, I would have to go to morocco to find one in the ground:lol: I got this at Tuscon.
 

Coleonyx

New member
so you collect fossils. thats pretty cool. I used to do that. Alls that I would ever find is bilaves, shark teeth, and criniods though. You are much better at it!!

I collect dead bugs. I frame them and stuff.
 

docszoo

New member
So, any more hints at the moment? Like how to calm down a gecko :lol: Like I said, that day, she would be constantly moving (but, I should not expect her to be completly still :roll: )
 

Coleonyx

New member
i have heard of reptile photographers putting them in the fridge before the take pics. I would never do that and I wouldn't recommend it. You just have to be quick to take advantage of an opportunity.
 

Coleonyx

New member
"The next morning I was up early trying to figure out how to photograph
the viper without being bitten or allowing it to escape. The solution
was simple. I placed the snake in our ice chest for several minutes
until it was cool enough to be safely manipulated. However, instead of
concentrating on photographing the snake, I was now distracted by the
wonderful smells emanating from the kitchen, and soon I found myself
with fork in hand and a mouthful of the fluffiest scrambled eggs I had
ever eaten.
“More eggs, Paul?” Tom asked, after my third helping.
“No, not for me, I don’t eat breakfast,” I explained. At that point, I
remembered what I had initially intended to do before I got sidetracked.
I jumped up from the table and ran over to the ice chest.
“Damn it,” I bellowed, as I opened the ice chest. The pillowcase that
contained the snake had fallen and was now submerged under three inches
of ice water.
“Problem?” Jack asked.
“I just killed the Bothrops.” I was hoping to keep it alive to bring back
to the States, as I had promised a colleague that I would save him any live
pit vipers I came across. On the bright side, I no longer had to worry
about the snake escaping or biting me while I tried to photograph it. I
carried it by hand to a small clearing near one of the huts. Placing the
reptile in various “naturalistic” poses, I took several photographs that I
thought made the snake appear to be alive. (This is a common technique
I have used on many expeditions and is referred to in the business as
“nature faking.”) Following the photo shoot, I returned the snake to the
cold, soaked bag, tied a knot in it, and hung it on a nail in the main dining
room for Jack to preserve. Half an hour later, Jack removed the bag from
its perch, untied the knot, and poured the contents on the table. Before
grabbing the snake, he gave it a long, hard look, then turned and gave me
a long, cold stare. The “dead” snake was flicking its tongue as it slowly
crawled off the table.
Two days later, another herper wanted to photograph the snake, but
since the viper had had time to recover, I decided it would be safer if once
again we cooled it down first. After nearly forty-five minutes in the cooler,
I was both astonished and extremely upset with myself to discover that,
once again, I had killed the snake. This time, however, I was careful not to
use my hands during the photo session, just in case we were dealing with
some kind of supernatural snake. The precaution was well founded. Several
minutes after the “dead” snake was exposed to the warm environment,
“Lazarus” was once again among the living. This was one snake I
was not going to turn my back on and would never again try to photograph.
Despite the failed attempts on its life, the snake survived the trip
to the United States. It was welcomed by my colleague who, after hearing..."

just in case you dont want to read the whole thing
 

Hazpat

New member
lol I sort of did that once. I found a dead sidewinder so I took it home and put in in the freezer, a few days later i took it out and put it in a striking pose to get some shots. the pictures still came out kind of crappy because I didnt know how to work the camera right. :lol:
 

ryanm

New member
I don't have any gecko pics with decent equipment, but I do have a number of decent snake pics.

Jungle Carpet Python (Morelia spilota cheynei)
10-28-05_1.jpg


10-28-05_2.jpg


10-28-05_3.jpg


Centralian Python (Morelia bredli)
10-28-05_4.jpg


11-12-05_2.jpg


West Paupan Carpet Python (Morelia spilota variegata)
IJHetFemale_1.jpg


IJHetFemale_2.jpg


IJHetMale_3.jpg


The trick to all of these photos was equipment and patience. I have a ring light, which keeps the subjects bright enough without casting annoying shadows, and a decent macro lens (Tamron 90mm), and between the two of those, I can get some pretty decent pictures up close. Lighting is key: cameras don't take pictures, they capture light, so your subject will only look as good as the light reflecting off of it. More ambient light is always better, especially with digital cameras. Direct light washes out colors and causes specular highlights, but like someone else said, a simple sheet of paper or even a white t-shirt placed between a light and the subject, or behind a light pointed away from the subject, can make all the difference in the world. Also, the more pictures you take, the more likely you are to get a good one. For me, I average about one usuable shot in 10, and about one really good shot in 50.

ryanm
 

yuri

New member
not sure what type of camera you are using, but I see a few potential problems.

1. shutter lag. This is the time that elapses when you press the shutter release and when the camera actually opens the shutter. The small, compact, rangefinder type digital cameras have a pronounced shutter lag. This means that when you press the shutter release, it takes a relatively long time for the shutter to open - time in which you or the subject can move. The results can be altered compositions as well as out of focus photos.

2. focus points. These are were the camera tries to lock on an area it thinks you want in focus. One some cameras, these are little rectangles or squares etched into the focusing screen. Some cameras can even illuminates these to show you were it has locked focus. Some cameras don't show you were these are, that is where you have to consult your manual to find out. It looks like your camera is not focusing where you want it. Most of the latest photos seem to be focused on the background. Some cameras can be put into a manual focus mode to allow you to decide what is in focus.

3. light. Some photos appear to have camera shake/movement problems. The shutter speed is not fast enough to mask any camera movement, and it shows up as slight or sometimes heavy motion blurs. More light can solve that problem and/or higher ISO setting and/or improving hand holding technique.

Let us know what type of camera you are using.
 
Top