New Toys!

ryanm

New member
I got some new camera toys this week, and I haven't really had any time to play with them yet, but I took this last night, hand held, with a new lens that arrived yesterday.

DSC_1183.jpg


I know I can do better than that with a tripod and some time, but I was just running around looking for something to take pictures of, and the moon was close enough to fill the frame. ;)

Just wait until I have time to start playing with the new macro toys I got. :shock:

ryanm
 

Nathan Hall

Founding Father
Very cool. I'm still bummed that i didn't get to use my brother's telescope before he sold it. He spent like $20,000 on the freaking thing. IT WAS HUGE!!!
 

ryanm

New member
Going the other direction, here are a couple test shots with my new macro toys.

Portrait of Roosevelt...
DSC_1212.jpg


...from a DIME! (hold a dime up to the screen to get an idea of just how much magnification this really is)
DSC_1213.jpg


Scale detail...
DSC_1216.jpg


...ever wonder what that melanin really looks like?
DSC_1216_crop.jpg


Sahara headshot...
DSC_1227.jpg


...closer
DSC_1227_crop.jpg


The size on those closeups are still less than 100%, none of those pics were scaled up at all, in fact all of them were scaled down significantly to make them viewable on the web. These images are 700-1000 pixels wide, the originals are >3000 pixels wide, so I can print them at at least 3 times this size.

And now that I'm playing with this stuff, I can think of at least one more thing I need for taking macros.
;)

I'll get some outdoor shots with the big boy this weekend when I go fishing with my brothers again.

ryanm
 

the moof

New member
Ryanm, that snake... does it have spurrs? I would dearly love to see a closeup picture of the spurrs on a boa...

regards,
*the moof*
 

ryanm

New member
the moof said:
holy ****. how much did you pay for this stuff?

camera model, and all tool names please? :p

Well, the expensive part was the lens I used for the first shot (the moon). It's a Sigma 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 APO DG OS, and it's big enough and heavy enough (but waaay too expensive) to be used effectively as a boat anchor. :p

It was expensive (~$1k), but I think it'll be worth it when I get my next chance to shoot birds in flight and that sort of thing. The OS part of the lens model means "optical stabilization", which means it compensates for your hands shaking when you're zoomed out to 400mm and trying not to get a blurry picture. But it weighs 4lbs, and even though that doesn't sound like a lot, try holding a can of paint a foot in front of your face for 5 minutes and see how much you like it. ;)

The macro toys weren't actually all that expensive. The main thing was a $35 Br-2a adaptor. The Br-2a is actually a lense reversing ring, which I used to mount my 50mm prime on the camera backwards. Yes, I said *backwards*. :twisted:

See, the trick is, a 50mm prime lens is a wide-angle, landscape type lens. It's meant for taking pictures of wide spaces. So if you flip it over the other way, it does the opposite: takes pictures of very tiny things. When you flip a lens over backwards, though, you no longer have such nicities as autofocus or aperature control, in fact no automatic anything or even any kind of focus. So you have to use a lens with a manual aperature control, and focus is achieved by varying the distance to the subject. So for the dime shots I used a reversed 50mm prime, a 2x converter, and 4 inches of extension tubes, which gave me an effective reproduction ratio of 5:1 (5x life size). Then the problem is that at that kind of magnification, your depth of field is literally less than a millimeter at high aperature settings. So I had to go down to F18 to get that shot, which meant a 5 second exposure to get enough light to be able to actually see it (I obviously used a tripod, no one can hand hold a 5 second exposure). It's a fairly complicated and difficult process, but you can get some amazing photos with it with a little work. I plan to do some stuff with water and other liquids, not to mention some tiny insect shots.

It's a neat trick, but it takes some patience and a lot of light to get it to work. My next "macro toy" will be a 28mm landscape lens, because it should allow me to get up to 6:1 when reversed. :wink:

I guess I could use it for landscapes too. :p

The camera is the same Nikon D70 that I've been using for a while now.

ryanm
 

ryanm

New member
the moof said:
Ryanm, that snake... does it have spurrs? I would dearly love to see a closeup picture of the spurrs on a boa...
I don't keep any boas, and none of my pythons have visible spurs (although some do). Have you never seen them before or are you just interested in closeups? I'm sure you can find pics of them on the web, but probably not as close as my scale shots.

ryanm
 

the moof

New member
Im very interested in closeups. I had the joy of getting them in my arm in madagascar. haha. Very big male Acrantophis.

If you ever get the chance to take a spurr shot, i would greatly appreciate seeing closeups.

regards,
*the moof*
 
Top