The article barely gets into the interesting stuff before basically saying "they squeak loudly." It hardly brushes up against any real substance that one might glean about Uroplatus anatomy, relying on sources that most non-academic people are not going to be able to access. Almost insultingly, it wraps up with "lots more on leaf-tailed geckos to come." I can only assume he meant from the scientific community, because his blog never did more than briefly mention the genus since publishing this article in 2010 (even after moving to SciAm).
I'm almost willing to bet we'll never understand the ecology of most Uroplatus, much less the ecological role of these briefly described adaptations. Unfortunately, it seems like basic ecology and natural/life history have fallen to the wayside for anything but the most model-suited species, which are researched ad nauseam. Don't get me wrong, I fully understand the reasons behind this, but I'm also frustrated at the fact that understanding some of the basics of species ecology (which are necessary for effective conservation) fall so far behind cutting-edge modelling and other types of hypothesis testing. We've become so focused on such small details that we've lost sight of the bigger picture.
Wow, I'll end my rant.