Since it has come to my attention that one of my pictures was posted here, I thought I would comment. Although Cyrtodactylus intermedius and C. pulchellus resemble each other in pattern and colouration, it is not a simple geographic issue. There is such a difference between the two in close examination, that I would doubt it is a case of allotropic speciation, but this will become more clear with a molecular phylogeny to see exactly how close they are related. It is easiest to distinguish Cyrtodactylus intermedius and C. pulchellus by examining the males. In male C. intermedius, males have 8-10 preanal pores at a wide angle and a group of 6-10 englarged preanal scales. In male C. pulchellus, there are two series of four preanal pores forming a right angle and 15-20 femoral pores along a longitudinal groove. The traits that separate all C. intermedius from all C. pulchellus is that all C. intermedius have a ventrolateral fold. There are many other differences between the species which take closer examination, such as: lamellae counts, supralabial counts and other measures of squamation.
As for Knot (Montri), I think you will see he has been very busy with geckos.