The study does not imply that at all. It does imply that UV penetration in Phelsuma is at a slower rate than human skin.
Another article (wish I could find it quickly) theorizes that the evolution of Phelsuma is more recently linked in time to nocturnal Gekkoninae. It implies Phelsuma have yet to fully develop UV absorbing skin more liken/efficient to day dwelling animals. Phelsuma still have the internal abilities to process dietary D3 efficiently more like their night dwelling cousins. (--- the artilce also points out that Phelsuma still do not have eyelides, a day dwelling need).
Again, I think that sun tolerant Phelsuma species (standingi) responding very well to UV. It also supports that Phelsuma can be raised on dietary D3 alone.
But I am with you that some Phelsuma species seem to respond in breeding and behavior with the presence of UV.
Another article (wish I could find it quickly) theorizes that the evolution of Phelsuma is more recently linked in time to nocturnal Gekkoninae. It implies Phelsuma have yet to fully develop UV absorbing skin more liken/efficient to day dwelling animals. Phelsuma still have the internal abilities to process dietary D3 efficiently more like their night dwelling cousins. (--- the artilce also points out that Phelsuma still do not have eyelides, a day dwelling need).
Again, I think that sun tolerant Phelsuma species (standingi) responding very well to UV. It also supports that Phelsuma can be raised on dietary D3 alone.
But I am with you that some Phelsuma species seem to respond in breeding and behavior with the presence of UV.